Tax
Deducted at Source, best known as TDS in India, is one of the modes of
collecting Income Tax from
assesses by the Income Tax Department, wherein, the Payer of a sum deducts specified amount of tax before making payment to the payee/Deductee and then deposits the amount to the credit of the Government.
assesses by the Income Tax Department, wherein, the Payer of a sum deducts specified amount of tax before making payment to the payee/Deductee and then deposits the amount to the credit of the Government.
As per section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, any deduction
made as per the provisions of TDS and paid to the credit of Central Government,
shall be treated as payment of tax on behalf of the person, from income of whom
the deduction has been made. From the provisions of this section, it is
evident that the government has made the payer/Deductor a collection agent, who
deducts and deposits tax in advance, from the income of payee/Deductee.
In India, the concept of TDS has been growing leaps and bounds,
as it checks tax evasion. This method of collection of tax, accounts for more
than 50 percent of total income tax collection. As per the Provisions of the
Income Tax Act, TDS is being deducted under different sections for different
kinds of income, for instance, deduction of tax on salary is made u/s 192, for
fees for professional and technical services u/s 194J, payment to contractors
u/s 194C, Payment of rent u/s 194 I, payment of commission u/s 194 H and few
others.
The problem arose, when the Government of India, Imposed Service
Tax on various services, the payment for which also attracts TDS provisions.
For instance providing a contractor’s service attracts service tax and the
service provider charges service tax on his invoice and the payer or the
service receiver needs to deduct TDS on payments made to the contractor. Confusion
erupted that whether TDS should be deducted on total invoice value including
the service tax or the invoice value excluding the service tax.
The CBDT, based upon the representations received, vide Circular
No. 4/2008, dated 28/04/2008, clarified that TDS on rent is deducted u/s 194I,
and as the TDS has to be deducted out of income of the recipient and service
tax collection is not the income of the recipient, no TDS is required to be
deducted on service tax amount. This circular, brought the much awaited
clarification, which was also obvious, keeping the intent of legislature, to
collect tax on prospective income of receiver and check tax evasion in mind;
Based upon this circular the professional and corporate world stopped deduction
of tax at source on the service tax amount;
However, the CBDT, vide Circular No. 275/73/2007-IT (B), dated
30-06-2008, again clarified that the clarification regarding TDS on rent u/s
194 I, will not be applicable to TDS on fees for professional and technical
services; as per the provisions of section 194I, TDS has to deducted on ANY
INCOME arising out of rent, whereas, as per section 194J, TDS has to be
deducted on ANY SUM paid as fees for professional and technical services;
This circular of the Board, triggered a plethora of
controversies regarding TDS on Service Tax and this position of the CBDT is
still open and requires an amicable solution; The Board, vide its second
circular, has done a literal interpretation of the words used in the Act,
ignoring the intent of the law. Intent of the law has been to collect tax in
advance on supposed income of the recipient, so as to check tax evasion; the
service tax amount is not an income of the recipient. As the payer acts as a
collection agent of TDS, in the same way the recipient is acting only as a collection
agent of Service Tax. The recipient collects service tax from the service
receiver and deposits it into the credit of the government, so deduction of Tax
on an amount which does not belong to the recipient is not warranted for;
As per section 199 discussed above also, the TDS deducted on
income of the recipient is considered as tax paid by the recipient on his
income; Service Tax is not an income of the recipient, so if this circular of
the board is accepted, the whole intent of the law fails. Furthermore, a
circular cannot overrule the provisions of the Act; The intent of the law, that
TDS is deducted only on income is also made clear from a simple reading of
section 194J, which says, ‘deduct an amount equal to 10 percent of such sum as
income tax on income comprised therein’
CBDT’s circulars have a binding effect on the Income Tax
Authorities. So the Income Tax Officers and even the first appellant authority,
the CIT (A), are expected to follow this circular of the Board and demand
deduction of TDS even on the service tax amount, especially in case of TDS on
fees for professional and technical service u/s 194 J; However, the CBDT’s
circular does not have a binding effect on either the assesses or the ITAT and
High Courts and the Supreme Court of India, hence this Circular of the Board
can always be challenged and the assesses has a very good chance to prevail.
In case of certain other TDS provisions where service tax
provisions are also applicable, like payment of commission and brokerage u/s
194 H, Commission on sale of lottery tickets u/s 194 G, payment of insurance
commission u/s 194 D, the word “INCOME”, has been used, hence, in these cases
it is safe to deduct TDS only on the commission amount and not on the service
tax amount, based upon the first circular. However, in case of fees for
professional and technical services u/s 194J and payment to contractor’s u/s
194C, the word “ANY SUM” has been used, triggering the controversy? So if a
person intents to avoid controversy an buy peace of mind, TDS u/s 194J &
194C, should be deducted on value inclusive of service tax, based upon the
second circular, till the time the board does not further clarifies this issue
or a court of law supports the assesses.
Else the validity and applicability of the Board’s circular can
always be challenged before the Appellate Tribunals and even higher, as the
provisions of the law and intent of the law maker always prevails before a
circular which is acting as a demolishes of law rather than being explanatory.
This Article is written by CMA Samir Biswal. He can
be reached at cmasamirbiswal@gmail.com.
Subscribe to Studycafe by Email
0 comments:
Post a Comment