In one of
the major crackdowns on banks in recent times, the Reserve Bank
of India (RBI) penalised 22 for violating several norms, including the
rules on know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering. Penalties ranging
from Rs 50 lakh to Rs 3 crore were imposed on 12 public sector banks, nine
private sector banks and a foreign lender, Deutsche Bank. The details are:
Monetary Penalty List
Sl. No.
|
Name of the bank
|
Penalty Amount (in ` crore)
|
1
|
Andhra
Bank
|
2.5
|
2
|
Bank of
Baroda
|
3
|
3
|
Bank of
India
|
3
|
4
|
Canara
Bank
|
3.001
|
5
|
Central
Bank of India
|
3
|
6
|
Deutsche
Bank A.G.
|
1
|
7
|
Development
Credit Bank Ltd.
|
1
|
8
|
Dhanlaxmi
Bank Ltd.
|
2
|
9
|
Indian
Overseas Bank
|
3.002
|
10
|
ING
Vysya Bank Ltd.
|
1.5
|
11
|
Jammu
& Kashmir Bank Ltd.
|
2.501
|
12
|
Kotak
Mahindra Bank Ltd.
|
1.501
|
13
|
Oriental
Bank of Commerce
|
2
|
14
|
Punjab
and Sind Bank
|
2.5
|
15
|
Punjab
National Bank
|
2.5
|
16
|
State
Bank of India
|
3
|
17
|
The
Federal Bank Ltd.
|
3
|
18
|
The
Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd.
|
2.5
|
19
|
The
Ratnakar Bank Ltd.
|
0.5
|
20
|
United
Bank of India
|
2.5
|
21
|
Vijaya
Bank
|
2
|
22
|
Yes
Bank Ltd.
|
2
|
Total
|
49.505
|
In respect of seven other banks, as indicated below, where
such scrutinies have been conducted and banks’ explanation called for, the
banks’ written or oral submissions were found to be satisfactory or no
violation of serious nature has been established. It has, therefore, been
decided not to impose any monetary penalty but to issue only suitable
cautionary letters.
Cautionary Letter
Sl. No.
|
Name of the bank
|
1
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
2
|
BNP Paribas
|
3
|
Citibank N.A.
|
4
|
Royal Bank of Scotland
|
5
|
Standard Chartered Bank
|
6
|
State Bank of Patiala
|
7
|
The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.
|
A similar scrutiny was also conducted in seven other banks
during April and May 2013. The process of follow up action in respect of those
banks is at different stages of its completion.
The penalties have been imposed in exercise of powers vested
in the Reserve Bank under the provisions of Section 47(A) (1) (c) read with
Section 46(4)(I) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Background
It may be recalled that the Reserve Bank of India had
carried out a scrutiny of books of accounts, internal control, compliance
systems and processes of these banks at their offices during April 2013. The
scrutiny of these banks revealed violation of certain regulations and
instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India, namely,
- non-adherence
to certain aspects of know your customer (KYC) norms and anti money
laundering (AML) guidelines like customer identification procedure, risk
categorisation, periodical review of risk profiling of account holders,
periodical KYC updation;
- non-adherence
of KYC for walk in customers including for sale of third party products,
omission in filing of cash transaction reports (CTRs) in respect of some
cash transactions, sale of gold coins for cash beyond ` 50,000;
- non-adherence
to instructions on monitoring of transactions in customer accounts;
- non-adherence
to instructions on classification of accounts as ‘in-operative’/dormant
and lapses in monitoring of transactions in dormant accounts;
- non-adherence
to instructions which prohibits acceptance of cash above ` 50,000
from customers for sale of gold coins and issue of Demand Drafts, etc.;
- non-adherence
to instructions on the upper limit for remittances under Liberalised
Remittance Scheme, upper limit for repatriation of funds from nonresident
ordinary (NRO) accounts;
- Non-adherence
to instructions on import of gold on consignment basis.
The investigation did not reveal any prima facie evidence of
money laundering. However, any conclusive inference in this regard can be drawn
only by an end to end investigation of the transactions by tax and enforcement
agencies.
Based on the findings of the scrutiny, the Reserve Bank
issued a show cause notice to each of these banks, in response to which the
individual banks submitted written replies. After considering the facts of each
case and individual bank’s reply, as also, personal submissions, information
submitted and documents furnished, the Reserve Bank came to the conclusion that
some of the violations were substantiated and warranted imposition of monetary
penalty. The Reserve Bank penalised the first lot of three banks.
This Article is written by CMA Samir Biswal.
He can be reached at cmasamirbiswal@gmail.com.
Subscribe to Studycafe by Email
0 comments:
Post a Comment