Service Tax not applicable on Electricity charge recovered from tenant

Electricity charge recovered from tenant not includible in renting of immovable property:

An important judgement of the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai in the case of In Ticel Bio Park Ltd. (2013) 33 taxmann.com 102 (CCE‐Chennai) on following issue:

Issue:

Whether electricity charges towards electricity consumed by tenant, recovered on actual basis by landlord are includible in value of renting of immovable property services?

Facts & Background:

M/s Ticel Bio Park Ltd. (“the Appellant”) was rendering “Renting of Immovable Property Services” (“the renting services”). However, the Appellant didn't include the electricity and air conditioning charges in the taxable value while paying service tax on the charges collected towards 'Renting of Immovable Property Services'. The Department contended that the electricity charges were liable to service tax by inclusion in the value of the renting services.

The Appellant contended that no service tax is payable on the electricity charges which was the actual amount paid to the Electricity Board as the same is deductible in terms of Rule 5(2) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 (“the Valuation Rules”) under “Pure agent”.

Further, the Appellant also argued that no service tax is payable on supply of electricity which is ‘goods’ and not‘service’.

Decision:

It was held by the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) (“the Commissioner Appeals”) that no Service tax is demandable on electricity charges recovered on actual basis, which was paid to the Electricity Board.
The Commissioner Appeals observed that the Appellant had provided individual electricity meters for each module in the tenancy area for every tenant and maintained complete record of the electricity consumption for every month. The Appellant collected charges for electricity consumed by tenants and remitted to the Electricity Department. The Appellant did not collect any excess money over the electricity charges. Therefore, the activity of the Appellant was covered by the definition of Pure Agent as per Rule 5(2) of the Valuation

Rules and such reimbursable expense need not be included in the taxable value of the Renting services.

It is pertinent to note that the exclusion from the taxable value is given in sub‐rule (2) of Rule 5 of the Valuation Rules, as to the expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider as a pure agent of the recipient of service, on fulfilment of certain conditions enumerated there in. It is construed that the expenditure incurred for procuring the goods and services for the service recipient by the service provider and which was recovered on actual basis will not be included in the taxable value.

Further, it was held that the activity of providing electricity consumed by tenants and remitted to the Electricity Board tantamount to sale of goods and no service is rendered by the Appellant.
Hence,the case was decided in favour of the Appellant.

Relevant legal provisions post Negative List Regime w.e.f 1‐7‐2012:

Service tax is not applicable w.e.f.July 1, 2012 under Section 66D(k) of the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”) on transmission or distribution of electricity by an electricity transmission or distribution utility. An ‘electricity transmission or distribution utility’ has been defined in Section 65B(23) of the Finance Act. It includes the following –
• the Central Electricity Authority

• a State Electricity Board 

• the Central Transmission Utility (CTU) 

• a State Transmission Utility (STU) notified under the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) 

• a distribution ortransmission licensee licensed underthe said Act

• any other entity entrusted with such function by the Central or State Government.

This Article has been written by Vinanti Zatakiya. You can reach her at vinanti2504@gmail.com

Subscribe to Studycafe by Email