[X] Close
[X] Close

Clarification on the notification dated 12.9.2013 - MCA

Clarification on the notification dated 12.9.2013
 
This Ministry had issued a notification on 12.09.2013 bringing into force to 98 sections or part thereof of the companies Act, 2013. The said notification is available on the Ministry's website. This Ministry has been receiving requests for clarification as to whether the provisions of the companies Act, 1955 corresponding to such sections would continue to apply or not. It is hereby clarified that with effect from 12.09.2013, the relevant provisions of the companies Act, 1956, which correspond to provisions of 9g sections of the companies Act, 2013 brought into force on 12.09.2013, cease to have effect from that date.
 To Download Click here
 
Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 
2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195



 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 

 



 


This




.

Government to enforce Companies Bill in phases

One of the top priorities of the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) is to facilitate the setting up of the National Company Law Tribunals (NCLTs). In parallel, the draft rules of the new companies bill will be finalized through a process of consultation with all stakeholders.

The provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, which recently got Presidential assent, will be enforced in phases. While 98 sections of the new act are now in force, for which a notification for commencement was issued on September 12, the remaining sections will be notified in a phased manner.

"The new act is comprehensive with 470 sections. Those sections which require functioning of new bodies - such as the tribunal, or prescription of relevant rules/forms - will be brought in force after the preparatory action is completed. By 2013 end, a majority of the sections will be notified and the balance will be notified by the end of the fiscal year - March 31, 2014," said Sachin Pilot, minister of corporate affairs, replying to a question raised by TOI.

He further added that the relevant provisions pertaining to these newly notified sections, as contained in the earlier Companies Act, 1956, will stand repealed.

Many professionals are puzzled with the parallel existence of the earlier act of 1956 with the new act of 2013. "The main objective of notifying the 98 sections, which incidentally did not require any preparatory action, was to put the entire process of implementation of the new act on a fast track mode," M J Joseph, additional secretary, MCA, told TOI. Sections notified so far also cover the constitution of the NCLTs.

Pilot, addressing a CII conference in the city on Monday, sought to alleviate apprehensions raised by India Inc on some of the more stringent provisions of the new act, by calling for a consensus-based approach in finalizing the draft rules of the Companies Act, 2013.

MCA will, after suggestions from stakeholders, revisit the threshold in terms of share capital, turnover and other criteria, set down for compliance by the corporate sector, across a wide range of provisions. These also include provisions relating to appointment of independent directors and rotation of auditors.

Currently, draft rules require public companies with a paid-up share capital of Rs 100 crore or more, or a turnover of Rs 300 crore or more, or having outstanding loans or borrowings or debentures or deposits exceeding Rs 200 crore or more to have a composition of which at least a third are independent directors. These thresholds are open for discussion.

India Inc is apprehensive that rotation of auditors introduced by the new act would apply in all instances to all companies irrespective of their size, including private companies. Thresholds would also be set under a consultative approach to determine which companies would be required to implement auditor rotation.

"The new act and rules will ensure less regulation, more voluntary compliance and will facilitate doing business in India more efficiently," summed up Pilot.

Meanwhile, MCA Govt gets RoC report on NSEL Mumbai: The ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) on Monday obtained a technical report from the Registrar of Companies ( RoC) on the National Spot Exchange Limited ( NSEL) crisis. The report will be examined and action will be taken against NSE and its group companies for any violation. of the companies act, said Sachin Pilot., corporate affairs minister. NSEL has defaulted on payments totalling more than Rs 5,500 crore.

Pilot added that the government has already set up two committees to look into the irregularities. Agencies such as commodity market regulator Forward Markets Commission, Enforcement Directorate and tax authorities were also looking into the issue. On being quizzed on a key factor behind the irregularities, wherein produce traded through warehousing receipts allegedly did not exit, Pilot pointed out that this aspect is governed by a separate regulator, the Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority.
 
Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 
2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195

Rotation of auditors: Inconsistency between new Companies Act and Draft Rules

The new Companies Act has enhanced scope of auditors by mandating internal audit for such class of companies as may be specified, while by imposing civil liability on the auditors, the Act requires auditors to be more cautious and careful while auditing
 
Following the trend in the US, which replaced its 37 year old Companies Act in 2006, India is also replacing its nearly six decades old law (Companies Act, 1956) with the new Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). The New Act has already been assented by Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on 18 December 2012 and 8 August 2013, respectively. It received the nod from the President on 29 August 2013. The Companies Bill, which was in pipeline since five years, has now been enacted as Act no: 18 of 2013 that will replace the 1956 Act.
 
 The 1956 Act had some 658 sections and 14 schedules and the new Act has 470 sections and 7 schedules. This does not mean that the Act has now been made smaller or simpler. The words ‘as may be prescribed’ is appearing at 416 places in the Act, which means a huge amount of law will be enacted by way of rules to be issued by the government in process.
As the Act has already got the assent of the President last month, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has placed on its portal, the draft rules for public comments on 6 September 2013 (Draft Rules) inviting comments till 8 October 2013.
Here are some conflicting provisions in the Draft Rules and the Act relating to rotation of auditors in listed and in certain class of companies to be specified.
 
Provision under the Act
Among others, one of the major changes, which the new Act is proposing, is that it has now put a restraint on the terms of the auditors. Under the 1956 Act, statutory auditors were to be appointed by companies annually. However, section 139 of the new Act now requires appointment (which has been defined by way of an explanation under sub-section (1) to include re-appointments also) of auditors at every sixth annual general meeting (AGM) and the appointment is to be ratified at every AGM.
On the sixth AGM, the auditor is eligible for reappointment, in terms of section 139 (9), subject, however, to the mandatory retirement provisions of sub-section (2) of the said section.
Additionally, in terms of sub-section (2), in case of listed companies or companies of a class to be notified, there is a bar on reappointment of an auditor, if he has already held: (a) one term of 5 years in case of an individual; or (b) two consecutive terms of 5 years in case of a firm. Once the bar on reappointment applies, there is a mandatory cooling-off period of 5 years.
On one hand, where the Act has enhanced the scope of auditors by mandating internal audit for such class of companies as may be specified, on the other hand, by imposing civil liability on the auditors, the Act now requires auditors to be more cautious and careful while auditing.
Provisions under the Companies Rules, 2013
After the new and strict provisions relating to audit and auditors in the Act, the Draft Rules seems to be another challenge for the chartered accountants. Rule 10 of the Draft Rules deals with provisions relating to audit and auditors.
 
Rule 10.4 (4) of the Draft Rules reads as:
 
“For the purpose of the rotation of auditors:
(i) In case of an auditor (whether an individual or audit firm), the period for which he or it has been holding office as auditor prior to the commencement of the Act shall be taken into account in calculating the period of five consecutive years or ten consecutive years, as the case may be.
(ii) The incoming auditor or audit firm shall not be eligible if such auditor or audit firm is associated with the outgoing auditor or audit firm under the same network of audit firms or is operating under the same trade mark or brand.”
 
Para (i) above says that for the purpose of rotation of auditors under section 139 (4) (applicable to listed and other to be specified class of companies), the existing term of auditors shall also be taken into account. This is clearly contrary to the language of section 139(2) of the Act, which refers to "one term of 5 years" or "two terms of 5 years each".
Prior to the commencement of the Act, there may be no appointment of auditor for a term of five years at all. Even if an auditor has been holding his office for 5 years under the 1956 Act, it is not one term of 5 years, but 5 terms of one year each. If an auditor gets reappointed, it does not mean the term is any longer than annual. However, under the Act, before issue of Draft Rules, it was predicted that the ‘term’ will be new term starting after notification of the Act. The Draft Rules have, though divergent with the Act, made it clear, the existing term under the 1956 Act will also be counted for calculating the 5 years or 10 years term. It would mean that if the tenure of appointment of auditors under the Act will effectively be 4 years or 9 years and all related conditions are to be read with such term only.
As the Draft Rules are open for public comments till 8 October 2013 only, the chartered accountants should raise objection/ concern over this particular point to MCA.
 
Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 
2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195
 
 

Companies Act 2013: Tough Norms for Auditors


The Union Government on Monday released draft notes for clauses of the Companies Act that replaces a six decade old legislation. Life is set to get tougher for auditors and audit firms, with the draft rules of the Companies Act proposing to not just make auditors, but even audit firms, liable for frauds. So far, chartered accountants were penalized but the new law also puts firms under the spotlight.  
In addition, the draft rules have proposed that in case of conviction, auditors will not only have to refund the remuneration received by them but also pay damages to authorities as well as individuals, who have been affected by incorrect or misleading statements in audit reports. The tighter rules for auditors, including rotation, are the result of the alleged lapses seen during the Satyam scandal.
As a result, the Companies Act has mandated rotation of auditors. The government in the draft rules has proposed that the existing audit assignments, which were taken up before the law was enacted, should also be counted, while calculating the maximum five-year term that has been prescribed. The so-called incoming auditor will not be eligible if he has been associated with the outgoing one by virtue of being part of the same network or is operating under the same brand. The draft rules have also proposed that where the company has two or more persons as joint auditors, it will have to follow the rotation policy in such a way that all the joint auditors do not complete the term in the same year.
The new rules have given some breather in terms of reporting on fraud by auditors to the Union government. Auditors are required to report material fraud within 30 days to the government. Materiality shall mean frauds happening frequently or those where the amount involved or likely to be involved is not less than five per cent of net profit or two per cent of turnover of the company for the preceding financial year. It has also introduced the concept of class-action lawsuits. For negligence in their duties, auditors are liable to pay damages to the company or any other person for losses arising from incorrect statements in the audit report.
Auditors also have to take indemnity insurance against third-party liabilities, likely to be highly expensive. Auditors fear only the larger firms will be able to afford higher insurance costs.
The Act also mandates that an audit firm and all its partners are jointly liable for any fraudulent action of even a single partner. Earlier only the partner in question had to face the consequences of negligence; with this new rule, an entire firm of auditors might have to down shutters for the errors of one partner.
The auditor is now also required to report on whether the company has adequate internal financial controls system in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls.
Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 
2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195

MCA Releases the draft rules for the New Companies Act, 2013 and invite suggestions


The draft Rules for following 16 chapters under the Companies Act 2013 is made live for public comments in 1st phase. The last date of receiving comments on these rules is 08/10/2013:

 
 
Chapter I - Preliminary

Chapter II - Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto

Chapter VI - Registration of Charges

Chapter VIII - Declaration and Payment of Dividend

Chapter IX - Accounts of Companies

Chapter X - Audit and Auditors

Chapter XI - Appointment and Qualification of Directors

Chapter XII - Meeting of Board and its Powers

Chapter XVI - Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement

Chapter XVIII - Removal of Name of Companies from the Register of Companies

Chapter XIX - Revival and Rehabilitation of Sick Companies

Chapter XXII - Companies Incorporated Outside India

Chapter XXIV - Registration Offices and Fees

Chapter XXVI - Nidhi

Chapter XXVII - National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal

Chapter XXIX - Miscellaneous


Stakeholders are requested to use this platform for providing their suggestions and comments on the draft rules.

To download advertisement published in newspapers and draft rules (1st phase) under Companies Act, 2013 Click Here

Audit & Auditors under the Companies Bill-2012

Audit & Auditors under the Companies Bill-2012

The Companies bill, 2012 (Bill No. 121-C of 2011) was passed in Lok Sabha (Lower house of Indian Parliament) on 18th December, 2012. It is steadily moving towards becoming new legislation for corporate India. The Companies Act, 1956 suffers from some defects in the provision relating to audit. These were surfaced after various scams and fraud that shocked the corporate India. Therefore, it was important that the entire audit standards and systems were upgraded to bring them in line with globally accepted practices and make auditors more liable. Therefore, Companies Bill, 2012 provides for certain reformed provisions in respect thereof.    Provisions related to Audit & Auditors are mentioned in Sections 139 to 148 of chapter X.

Eligibility, Qualifications of Auditor [Section 141] :
As provided in Section 141(1), a person who is Chartered Accountant is eligible for appointment as an auditor of the company. If majority of partners of a firm are practicing Chartered Accountants in India, then such a firm may be appointed as an auditor. Where a firm including Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is appointed as an auditor then only partners who are Chartered Accountants shall be authorized to act & sign on behalf of the firm.

Disqualifications of Auditor [Section 141(3)] :
The following persons shall not be eligible for appointment as an auditor of a company –
a)     A body corporate other than LLP
b)    An officer or an employee of the company
c)     A person who is partner or who is in employment of an officer or employee of the company
d)    A person who or his relative or partner –
                               i.            is holding any security or interest (of  Face Value more than Rs. 1000)  in the company or its associate or its associate
                             ii.            is indebted to the company or its subsidiary or its associate in excess of amount as may be prescribed
                          iii.            has given guarantee or provided any security in connection with indebtedness to the third party  to the company or its subsidiary or its associate in excess of amount as may be prescribed
e)     A person or a firm who has direct or indirect business relationship
f)      A person whose relative is a director or in employment as key managerial personnel
g)     A person who has got audit of more than 20 companies at the time of appointment or reappointment
h)    A person who has been convicted by court of an offence involving fraud & period of 10 years has not been elapsed
i)       Any person whose subsidiary or associate company or any other form of entity which is engaged in rendering of services which are prohibited under Section 144
Section 141(4) has made it clear that if a person incurs any of the disqualification mentioned above after his appointment then he shall vacate the office.

Appointment of auditors [Section 139] :
Every company shall appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor at its first annual general meeting. Such auditor shall hold the office till conclusion of 6th annual general meeting and thereafter till conclusion of every 6th annual general meeting. Though appointment is for 5 years ratification is necessary at every annual general meeting.
In case of listed companies and certain other classes of companies to be prescribed, compulsory rotation is provided for :-

a)     In case of an individual as an auditor after one term of 5 years
b)    In case of  a firm as an auditor after 2 terms of 5 years
The auditor after completion of his term/(s) shall not be eligible for re-appointment for a period of 5 years. If a firm which has common partners with outgoing firm on the date of appointment, then such firm can not be appointed as an auditor of the company. Every company shall need to comply with these requirements with 3 years from date when provisions come into force.
Members of company may resolve to provide :-
a)     The auditing partner or auditing team shall be rotated at such intervals
b)    The audit shall be conducted by more than one auditor

Remuneration of Auditors [Section 142] :
The remuneration of auditors shall be decided at general meeting. First auditor’s remuneration may be fixed by the board. The remuneration shall include the expenses incurred by the auditor in connection with the audit and any facility extended to him but does not include any remuneration paid to him for any other service rendered by him at the request of the company.

Powers & Duties of Auditors [Section 143] :
Every auditor shall have right of access of books of accounts and vouchers of the company. He may also call for information and explanation which may be necessary for performance. The auditor of the holding company shall have right to access records of all its subsidiaries in relation to consolidation of financial statements. The auditor shall make report on account examined by him. He shall state his opinions of the matters laid down under Section 143(3). If the auditor has any qualification in any matter, then it shall be supported by reasons. Section 143(9) states that it is a duty of the auditor to comply with auditing standards. In the case of a Government company, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) shall appoint the auditor and direct such auditor the manner in which the accounts of the Government company are required to be audited and thereupon the auditor so appointed shall submit a copy of the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) which, among other things, include the directions, if any, issued by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, the action taken thereon and its impact on the accounts and financial statement of the company. If a company has branch office outside India then accounts of that branch shall be examined by the auditor or any accountant or any other person who is duly qualified to do so in accordance with laws of that country. He is required to prepare and send audit report of that branch to the auditor of the company. As stated in Section 143(12), if the auditor has found an offence involving fraud has been committed by officers or employees against the company then he shall immediately report the matter to Central Government within prescribed time and manner. If he fails to do so, then he shall be punishable with fine of between Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 25 lakhs.

Prohibition of undertaking of certain services [Section 144] :
Auditor shall not provide following services directly or indirectly to the company or its subsidiary or its holding company :-
a)     Accounting and book keeping services
b)    Internal audit
c)     Design and implementation of any financial information system
d)    Actuarial services
e)     Investment advisory services
f)      Investment banking services
g)     Rendering of outsourced financial services
h)    Management services
i)       Any other kind of services as may be prescribed
Provided that an auditor or audit firm who or which has been performing any non audit services on or before the commencement of this Act shall comply with the provisions of this section before the closure of the first financial year after the date of such commencement.
The term “directly or indirectly” shall include rendering of services :-
       i.            In case of auditor being an individual, either by himself or through his relative or any other person connected or associated with such individual
     ii.            In case of auditor being a firm, either itself or through any of its partners or through its parent, subsidiary or associate entity

Auditors to sign audit report [Section 145] :
The person appointed as an auditor shall sign auditor’s report or certify any other document of the company in accordance with provisions of Section 141(2).

Auditors to attend general meeting [Section 146] :
All notices, communication relating to any general meeting shall be forwarded the auditor. The auditor himself or his authorized representative, who shall be qualified to be an auditor shall have right to be heard on any part of business which concerns him as an auditor.

Removal, resignation of auditor [Section 140] :
The appointed auditor may be removed from his office before expiry of his term by special resolution after obtaining previous approval of Central Government in that behalf. The concerned auditor shall be given opportunity of being heard.
The auditor who has resigned from company shall file a statement in prescribed form with the company and the registrar within 30 days from date of resignation. If  the auditor fails to do so, then he shall be punishable with fine of between Rs.50 thousands to Rs. 5 lakhs.
Special notice is required for a resolution at an annual general meeting for appointment of an auditor other than retiring auditor. Copy of such notice is to be sent to the retiring auditor.

Punishment for contravention [Section 147] :
If provisions of sections 139 to 146 are contravened then company shall be punishable with fine of between Rs. 25 thousands to Rs. 5 lakhs. Every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or fine of  between Rs. 10 thousands to Rs. 1 lakh.
If the auditor contravenes any provisions then he shall be punishable with fine of between Rs. 25 thousands to Rs. 5 lakhs. If the auditor has deceived the company or its shareholders or tax authorities, then he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine of between Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 25 lakhs.

Cost audit in respect of certain companies [Section 148]:
Companies engaged in production of goods or providing such services as may be prescribed shall be directed to include utilization of material or labour or to other items of cost in the books of accounts. The audit of cost records shall be conducted by Cost Accountant in practice who shall be appointed by board and remuneration shall be decided by members is the manner as may be prescribed. No person appointed under section 139 as an auditor of the company shall be appointed for conducting the audit of cost records.

Secretarial audit of large companies [Section 204]
Every listed company and such class of companies as may be prescribed to annex with its Board’s report a Secretarial Audit Report, given by a Company Secretary in Practice, in such form as may be prescribed.

Constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority [Section 132] :
The Central Government may by notification constitute a National Financial Reporting Authority to provide for matters relating to accounting and auditing standards under this Act.
National Financial Reporting Authority shall :-
a)     make recommendations to the Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting and auditing policies and standards for adoption by companies or class of companies or their auditors
b)    monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards in such manner as may be prescribed
c)     oversee the quality of service of the professions associated with ensuring compliance with such standards, and suggest measures required for improvement in quality of service and such other related matters as may be prescribed
d)    perform such other functions relating to clauses (a), (b) and (c) as may be prescribed.
Any person aggrieved by any order of the National Financial Reporting Authority, may prefer an appeal before the Appellate Authority constituted in such manner as may be prescribed.

Conclusion
Minister for Corporate Affairs (in 2011), Veerappa Moily, had said “Mandatory rotation of statutory auditors every five years to make them more practical. This would ensure that promoter or company or management does not change auditor who is doing good job prematurely.” There are a number of issues regarding interpretation of these provisions on which clarifications would be required. The Companies bill, 2012 has bestowed powers to the auditor with certain responsibilities. The proposed provisions in new act have ensured auditor’s independence and duties of auditors have been enhanced.

This Article has been shared by Saurabh Wagle. He can be reached at saurabh.wagle@gmail.com

Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 
2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195


Subscribe to Studycafe by Email

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recommend us on Google!
-->