[X] Close
[X] Close

Sales Tax C, E & F Forms Demystified

1. INTRODUCTION
There are certain type of forms which has been prescribed under central sales tax rules 1957, form c for making interstate purchase at lower rate, form F used to transfer goods from one branch to other in different state without making it as sale form E1 and E2 used when interstate sale or purchase which are effected by mere transfer of document of title (subsequent sale).

2. ANALYSIS
A) C FORM
It is issued by VAT department to the registered dealer who makes interstate purchases of those goods which are mentioned in his RC (registration certificate). While doing transaction purchasing dealer furnish this form to selling dealer in course of interstate purchase to get exemption/reduction in sales tax rate. It is defined under section 8(1) of CST act 1956.



*One C Form/One Quarter/Dealer
From above chart it is clear that firstly purchasing dealer will furnish form C to the selling dealer of Jharkhand to claim tax exemption or reduced rates of taxes (2%) thereafter selling dealer will submit these form to the department of VAT of Jharkhand.
One C form can be used for no of transactions for one quarter.
 B) F FORM
With this, goods can be transferred/delivered from one state to another without recognising it as a sale. For instance the head branch may transfer goods/stock from one state to another to its branch or agent without becoming liable for CST.
It is issued by the VAT department on the request of the purchasing dealer (branch) the purchasing dealer submits F form to the selling dealer to claim exemption from making it as CST sale. As per section 6(A) of CST act F from is mandatory to prove transaction as stock transfer.
one F Form/One Month/Dealer
Is F form required in case goods are returned? The answer is yes, decided by the hon’ble Supreme court in case of AMBIKA STEELS that the liability of furnishing F form would be still there even if stock or goods are required to be sent back.
Registration certificate {RC} should contain the name and address of branches to which stock is transferred against F FORM {branch transfer} to claim concessional/nil rate of tax. One F form has to be issued for each month.


C) E1 AND E2 FORM
As per section 6(2) of CST act first interstate sale will be taxable, subsequent sale during movement of good by way of transfer of document is exempt from tax. For making subsequent sale exempt Form E1 & E2 are used.

From above illustration it is clear that how goods/document of title move from one place to another. Actual delivery was received by Chandan in Jaipur however between Ashok; Bhanu there was only transfer of title. Only the first sale will be taxable, other subsequent sale will be exempt if dealers are registered.
In above example Ashok of Jharkhand will receive C form from Bhanu of Delhi & will issue declaration in E-I form to Bhanu of Delhi .Later on Bhanu of Delhi will issue declaration in Form E-II to Chandan of Jaipur against which Chandan will furnish C form to Bhanu (Delhi).
If above chain is broken then the exempt sale will get reversed and CST will be applied on these transaction.

Provisions of C form applicable to E1/E2 forms: Some provisions which are applicable to C forms are also applicable to E-I/E-II forms. For example one declaration for one quarter, indemnity bond if form is lost, issue of duplicate form, sales tax concession is not available if the forms are not submitted.
Latest case of Delhi High Court and Supreme court’s verdict in A&G Projects and Technologies Ltd case: The Supreme court in A & G Projects and Technologies Ltd v. State of Karnataka [2209] 19 VST 239; [2009] 2 SCC 326 explained the scheme of section 6(2) of CST Act and held that once the first inter-state sale has suffered CST then subsequent sales effected by transfer of documents during transit will be exempt provided conditions prescribed u/s 6(2) are satisfied. This has been done to remove the cascading effect. The observation of the Supreme court in the said case is provided as below
“Analysing Section 6(2), it is clear that sub-section (2) has been introduced in Section 6 in order to avoid cascading effect of multiple taxation. A subsequent sale falling under sub-section (2), which satisfies the conditions mentioned in the proviso thereto, is exempt from tax as the first sale has been subjected to tax under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the CST ACT 1956. Thus, in order to attract Section 6(2), it is essential that the concerned sale must be a subsequent inter-State sale affected by transfer of documents of title to the goods during the movement of the goods from one State to another and it must be preceded by a prior inter-State sale. It is only then that Section 6(2) may be attracted in order to make such subsequent sale exempt from levy of sales tax. However, the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 6 prescribes further conditions and it is only on fulfilment of those conditions that the subsequent sale stands exempted. If those conditions are not satisfied then, notwithstanding the fact that the sale is a subsequent sale, the exemption would not be admissible to such subsequent sales.This is the scheme of Section 6 of the CST ACT 1956.”
 In a recent case namely Mitsubishi Corp. Ind. Ltd. Vs Value Added Tax officer decided by Delhi High court wherein sighting the above observation of the Supreme court it was argued by the councel for the state that if the first Inter State sales is an exempted sale then the subsequent sales should not get the benefit of Section 6(2) of CST Act even if all the conditions u/s 6(2) are satisfied since the first sales had not suffered tax. The Delhi High Court in this regard observed as under:
“A reading of the said portion of the Supreme Court decision only indicates that where the first sale is taxed, the second sale would be exempted because of the object of avoiding the cascading effect. However, the Supreme Court decision cannot be understood to mean that where the first sale is exempted, the second sale must be taxed even though the conditions under Section 6(2) for exemption stand satisfied.”
Thus even if the first sales was exempted due to exemption on tax available in the state wherefrom the first sale is made the subsequent sales in other state will be exempted if the conditions u/s 6(2) of CST Act are satisfied

This article has been share by:

Name - CA. Yogesh Sharma
E-mail id : cayksharma1@gmail.com
Mobile ; 093347-66898

THE CENTRAL SALES TAX: SALE OR PURCHASE AGAINST FORM H


As it relates to levy of tax on sale or purchase goods taking place in
the course of export of the goods out of territory of India or in the course of import of the goods into the territory of India, the Indian Constitution prohibits Indian States from imposing any tax on such sale or purchase. In the same Article of the Constitution, power of formulating principles for determining when a sale or purchase shall be deemed in the course of export or import has been given to the Union Parliament. The said article 286 runs as under:-
Restrictions as to imposition of tax on the sale or purchase of goods.-
(1)
No law of a State shall impose, or authorize the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of goods where such sale or purchase takes place-
(a)
outside the State; or
(b)
in the course of the import of the goods into, or export of the goods out of, the territory of India.
(2)
Parliament may by law formulate principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in any of the ways mentioned in clause (1).
(3)
Any law of a State shall, in so far as it imposes, or authorize the imposition of,-
(a)
a tax on the sale or purchase of goods declared by Parliament by law to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce; or
(b)
a tax on the sale or purchase of goods, being a tax of the nature referred to in sub-clause  (b), sub-clause (c) or sub clause (d) of clause (29A) of article 366, 
Be subject to such restrictions and conditions in regard to the system of levy, rates and other incidents of the tax as Parliament may by law specify.”
        For the purpose of discharging burden cast on it in clause (2) of Article 286 of the Constitution, the Parliament, for the purpose of defining sale or purchase in the course of export or import, has enacted section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Section 5 of the Central sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is part of Chapter 2 of the Act. Heading of the chapter 2 of the Act runs as follows:-
Formulation of Principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-state trade or commerce or outside a State or in the course of import or export
        Section 5 of the Act runs as under:
5. When is a sale or purchase of goods said to take place in the course of import or export.-
(1)
A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of the goods out of the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such export or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(2)
A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of the import of the goods into the territory of India only if the sale or purchase either occasions such import or is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods before the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of India.
(3)
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the last sale or purchase of any goods preceding the sale or purchase occasioning the export of those goods out of the territory of India shall also be deemed to be in the course of such export, if such last sale or purchase took place after, and was for the purpose of complying with, the agreement or order for or in relation to such export.
(4)
The provisions of sub-section (3) shall not apply to any sale or purchase of goods unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner a declaration duly filed and signed by the exporter to whom the goods are sold in a prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority.
(5)
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), if any designated carrier purchases Aviation Turbine Fuel for the purpose of its international flight, such purchase shall be deemed to take place in the course of the export of goods out of the territory of India.

Explanation.-For the purpose of this sub-section, 'designated Indian carrier' means any carrier which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf.
       Sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Act defines sale or purchase in the course of export of goods out of territory of India. This sub-section covers sales in the there is privity of contract in between selling dealer and foreign buyer of goods. Sub-section (2) of the said section defines when a sale or purchase shall be deemed in the course of import of goods into the territory of India.
         Earlier to amendment in section 5 with effect from April 01, 1976, there had been only two sub-sections in the section. In many cases, it was found that Indian suppliers after entering into contract of sale with foreign buyers had placed orders with Indian manufacturers or traders for supply of goods for fulfilling their contract with foreign buyers. Such Indian purchasers had assured Indian manufacturers or suppliers that sale of goods, in their hands, will also be sale in the course of export of the goods and will enjoy exemption from tax. But in the Case of Shirajuddin vs. State of Orissa (STC 1975), the Supreme Court of India laid down the principle that sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Act covers only those sales in which the privet of contract exists in between Indian exporter and foreign buyer. Thus, for the purpose of sales tax, only direct export sales were found covered under export sales. But this was not good for promotion of export. For promotion of export, it was found necessary to extend scope of definition of sale in the course of export. This was why the Parliament, in April 1976, enacted sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act.
       I would like to point out here that section 5 of the Act does not grant exemption from payment of tax on sale or purchase in the course of export of the goods out of or in the course of import of the goods into, the territory of India. Exemption from levy of tax by the States follows from the prohibition provided in Article 286 of the Constitution. As it relates to levy of tax by the Union, for well known reasons, levy of tax has not been found desirable. The section provides principles for determining whether or not a particular sale or purchase is in the course of export or import of the goods.
      Sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act, relates to a sale or purchase which shall also be deemed in the course of export where such sale to an exporter or purchase by an exporter is made for fulfilling its existing contract of export with foreign buyer. An export sale or purchase defined in sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act, has to satisfy following conditions: 
(i)
It should be the last sale or purchase immediately preceding the sale occasioning the export.
(ii)
The local purchase by the exporter, who has entered into contract with foreign buyer,  should have been made in reference to and in order to fulfill existing contract of export in between the exporter and the foreign buyer;
(iii)
Goods purchased by the exporter should be of the description mentioned in the export order;
(iv)
Goods, purchased by the exporter who has entered into the export contract with foreign buyer, are exported to the foreign destination given by the foreign buyer;
(v)
A declaration in the prescribed form (Form H) is issued by the exporter to the dealer making sale to the exporter.
        A local supplier, unless the exporter who supplies goods to foreign buyer tells about the satisfaction of the aforesaid conditions, cannot ascertain that export conditions are fulfilled. It is only the exporter, making direct export, who knows or can prove that conditions have been fulfilled. But at the end of local selling dealer, for proving sale in the course of export in terms of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act, such local selling dealer has to prove that sale, of goods sold by him to exporter, fulfills conditions of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act. For this he will have to depend upon the exporter.
       Prior to introduction of sub-section (4) in section 5 of the Act, it had been sufficient if conditions of sub-section (3) were satisfied by producing copy of export order, purchase order placed by the exporter, sale invoice issued by the local selling dealer and copy of bill of lading or airway bill. But after introduction of sub-section (4) in section 5 of the Act, all such evidences are meaningless unless declaration prescribed under sub-section (4) is furnished. Sub-section (4) speaks in clear words that provisions of sub-section (3) shall not apply in respect of any purchase or sale of goods unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner a declaration duly filed and signed by the exporter to whom the goods are sold in a prescribed form obtained from the prescribed authority.
        After introduction of sub-section (4) in section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, sub-section (3) is applicable only if compliance of sub-section (4) of section 5 has been made. Sub-section (3) of section 5 is no longer independent provision. Its applicability is subjected to sub-section (4) of the CST Act, 1956. Sub-section (4) not only applies in respect of sales referred to in sub-section (3) of section 5 but it also equally applies in respect of purchases referred to in sub-section (3) of section 5.  Therefore, it is mandatory for the exporter to issue Form H to the selling dealer.
Where several contracts of export of particular goods are pending with an exporter and the exporter makes purchase of such goods even if with an intention of fulfilling such export orders, he is not under any obligation to export such goods. The exporter, without breach of any contract,   can sell such goods in the local market. But where the exporter makes purchase of goods on condition of issuing Form H to the seller and later issues such Form, he creates a binding on him. In that case, he has to discharge undertakings given in Form H. If goods in respect of which Form H has been issued, are diverted in the local market or are disposed of otherwise than fulfilling the export order mentioned in Form H, then such exporter enters into breach of the contract with the selling.
       If we examine Form H, we find that it requires Registration Certificate Numbers of the selling dealer under the State Law and the Central Sales Tax Law. Also where goods exported are re-imported in India by the exporter, then such exporter is under an obligation to inform the assessing authority of the seller. Assessing authority of unregistered seller is not known. 
       Before introduction of sub-section (4) in section 5 of the CST Act, 1956, circumstances have been different. Also before amendment in relevant sub-rule (10) of Rule 12 of the Central Sales Tax (Registration & Turnover) Rules, 1957, Form was meant for claiming exemption from levy of tax on inter-state sale, which in absence of application of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the CST Act, 1957 would have been an inter-state sale. After amendment, applicability of sub-section (3) of section 5 depends on furnishing of Form H by the exporter to the seller. Where sub-section (3) of section 5 is found applicable, the exemption on such sale or purchase under the State Law comes from sub-clause (b) of clause (1) of Article 286 of the Constitution. So far as it relates to levy of tax by the Central Government, tax on such sale is not leviable because no law have been enacted by the Union Parliament for imposing tax on sale or purchase taking place in the course of export of the goods out of the territory of India.

       Before introduction of sub-section (4) in section 5 of the CST Act, 1956, circumstances have been different. Also before amendment in relevant sub-rule (10) of Rule 12 of the Central Sales Tax (Registration & Turnover) Rules, 1957, Form was meant for claiming exemption from levy of tax on inter-state sale, which in absence of application of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the CST Act, 1957 would have been an inter-state sale. After amendment, applicability of sub-section (3) of section 5 depends on furnishing of Form H by the exporter to the selling dealer. Where sub-section (3) of section 5 is found applicable, the exemption on such sale or purchase under the State Law comes from sub-clause (b) of clause (1) of Article 286 of the Constitution. Such purchase or sale is exempt from levy of the central sales tax because the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 does not provide for levy of tax on sale or purchase taking place in the course of export of the goods out of the territory of India.
        On examination of Form H, we find that it requires Registration Certificate Numbers of the selling dealer under the State Law and the Central Sales Tax Law. Also where goods exported are re-imported in India by the exporter, then such exporter is under an obligation to inform the assessing authority of the selling dealer. Assessing authority of unregistered selling dealer is not known. This implies that transaction of purchase and sale of goods should be in between a registered selling dealer and Registered exporter.
        In view of the foregoing discussion, it is clear that following cases of local sale or purchase are not covered under sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act:-
(i)
Where goods are purchased without reference to an export contract;
(ii)
Where contract of export does not exist at the time of making local purchase;
(iii)
Where a trader randomly makes purchases of goods for the purpose of export and he exports goods whenever he gets export order from foreign buyer;
(iv)
Where purchased goods are different from those mentioned in order of export. If finished goods are the subject matter of export order and exporter, for the purpose of manufacture of such finished goods, makes purchase of raw material, etc. for use in manufacture of such finished goods;
(v)
Where goods are not exported or exported goods are re-imported into the territory of India; or
(vi)
Where conditions of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act are not satisfied; or
(vii)
Where conditions of sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Act are satisfied but Form H has not been produced by the selling dealer before its assessing authority;
        As it relates to provisions of VAT Act, if export conditions are fulfilled then sale is in the course of export and State law is not applicable to local sales. These sales and purchases are protected by the provisions of the Constitution read with provisions of section 5 of the Central sales Tax Act, 1956. Hence there is no impact of commencement of VAT law in any State.
This Article is written by CMA Samir Biswal. He can be reached at cmasamirbiswal@gmail.com.


Subscribe to Studycafe by Email

FORMS & PROCEDURES UNDER CST

PROCEDURE:
Every dealer who effects inter-state sale is required to register with State sales tax authorities who are empowered to grant registration under CST Act. Application should be in form ‘A’. Security has to be furnished. Certificate of registration will be in form ‘B’.

PROCEDURE FOR REGISTRATION
 1. The dealer must make an application to the concerned authority in the appropriate state, in Form A within 30 days of the day when he becomes liable to pay tax. The form contains the following details.
(i) Name of the manager of business
(ii) Name and addresses of proprietor or partner of the business.
(iii) Date of establishment of business.
(iv) Date on which first inter-state sale was made.
(v) Name of the Principal place and other places of business in the appropriate state.
(vi) Particulars of any license held by the dealer.

 2. Single Place of business – If a dealer has single place of business in the appropriate State and he is registered in that state, he shall apply to the sales tax authority of that state only for obtaining registration under central sales tax Act

3. More than one place of business in the same state – If a dealer has more than one place of business in the same state , he shall select one of these places as the principal place of business and , get only one certificate of registration.

4. More than one place of business in different states. If a dealer has more than one place of Business in different states, he will get a separate certificate of registration with respect to each state.

5. Fees for Registration is Rupees twenty five to be paid in cash or court fee stamp.

6. The application has to be signed by, in case of –
• Sole proprietorship , the proprietor
• Partnership firm, any one the partner
• HUF, the karta
• Company, the director
• Government, authorized officer

Grant of Certificate of Registration sec 7 (3)
If the application is in order and assessing officer is fully satisfied with the facts contained therein, he will register the dealer under this Act and issue a certificate of Registration in Form B. If a dealer has more than one place of business then additional copies of certificate will be issued.
All items of purchase and sale must be included in CST Registration Certificate. Otherwise, these are not eligible for purchase at concessional rate.

FORMS
Form C, E-I/E-II, F, G, H, I and J have been prescribed to avail concessional rate of CST. Form C and E-I/E-II and F are required to be collected and submitted on quarterly basis. In case of forms H, I and J, no time limit has been prescribed. F form is to be obtained on monthly basis.
If C form is lost, indemnity bond in form G is to be given and then duplicate C form can be issued.

Prescribed forms under CST
Following are the forms prescribed under CST (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957.
Form
Description
Frequency
A
Application for registration
Once
B
Certificate of Registration
Once
C
Declaration by purchasing registered dealer to obtain goods at concessional rate
To be obtained for every quarter and submitted on quarterly basis
D
Form of certificate for making government purchases (D form cannot be issued in case of sale made to Government on or after 1-4-2007)
No question arises after 1-4-2007.
E-I/E-II
Certificates for sale in transit
To be obtained for every quarter and submitted on quarterly basis
F
Form by branch/consignment agent for goods received on stock transfer
Monthly, but to be submitted to authorities quarterly
G
Indemnity bond when C form lost
When required
H
Certificate of Export
Upto the time of assessment by first assessing authority.
I
Certificate by SEZ unit
Not specified in rules (but should be submitted before assessment).
J
Certificate to be issued by foreign diplomatic mission or consulate in India or the UN Agency
Upto the time of assessment by first assessing authority.

This article is compiled by Student of ICAI SHUBHI GOEL. She can be reached at Shubhigoel1989@gmail.com


Subscribe to Studycafe by Email

Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recommend us on Google!
-->