[X] Close
[X] Close

Section 168, the Companies Act, 2013: Resignation of directors

Section 168, the Companies Act, 2013: Resignation of directors Corresponding sections of the Companies Act, 1956: None this is a newly introduced section.  

DIRECTORS RESIGNATION UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013:-

1. The Director intending to resign shall send notice in writing to the Company. The resignation of a director shall take effect from:
ü The date on which the Notice Is Received by the company or
ü The Date, If Any, Specified by the Director in the notice, whichever is later.

2. The director who has resigned shall be liable even after his resignation for the offences which occurred during his tenure.

3. The law has caste duty upon the Director Resigning, to File Form DIR- 11 (Company shall file form DIR 12) and
üMention therein the Reason for Resigning.
üEnclose the copy of Notice sent to the Company.
üEnclose Proof Of Dispatch.
üFile the said form within 30 days of resignation along with the prescribed filing fees.



There is warning note at the end of the form which states as follows:

Note: Attention is also drawn to provisions of Section 448 and 449 which provide for punishment for false statement and punishment for false evidence respectively. These sections 448 and 449 relate to punishment for committing fraud or giving false evidence and these are non-compoundable offences.

Duty of Company in case of Resignation by Director As per section 168 (1):
A director may resign from his office by giving a notice in writing to the company and the Board. The company shall on receipt of such notice;

ü  Take note of the same by passing a board resolution to that effect and
ü  As per Rule 15 of Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 the company shall intimate the Registrar through Filing Of Form Dir.12 Within 30 Days From The Effective Date of Resignation on its website, if any.
ü  Company is also required to Place the Fact of Such Resignation in the Report of Directors laid in the immediately following general meeting by the company.

Duty of Resigning Director in case of Resignation:

A director shall also forward a Copy of his Resignation Along With Detailed Reasons for the resignation to the Registrar within 30 (Thirty) days of resignation through filing of Form DIR.11 under his Digital Signature. It means it will be mandatory for all directors to have Digital Signature under Companies Act-2013.



Effective date of Resignation:

As per section 168 (2), the resignation of a director shall take effect from the date on which the notice is received by the company or the date, if any, specified by the director in the notice, Whichever Is Later.  

SECRETARIAL PRACTICE:
As discussed above E-forms to be filed in case Resignation of Director are form DIR.11 and DIR.12.
ü  Filing of Form DIR.11 is the responsibility of resigning director under his/her digital signature and
ü  Whereas Filing of Form DIR.12 is the responsibility of Company.

Where all the directors of a company resign from their offices, or vacate their offices under section 167, the promoter or, in his absence, the Central Government shall appoint the required number of directors who shall hold office till the directors are appointed by the company in general meeting.

THINGS TO BE MENTIONED IN THE E-FORM DIR – 11: 
ü  Enter the date of appointment of resigning director in the company.
ü  In case of an alternate director, enter the DIN of the director to whom the appointee is alternate and click Pre-fill button. System will automatically display the name of the director to whom the appointee is alternate.
ü  Enter the date of filing of resignation with the company and also effective date of resignation specified in the notice.
ü  The resignation of a director shall take effect from the date on which the notice is received by the company or the date, if any, specified by the director in the notice, whichever is later. And the same effective date is required to be mentioned above.
ü  The effective date of resignation shall be same as the date of cessation entered in eForm DIR-12 if already filed by the company.
ü  It is mandatory to specify the reasons for resignation from the company. 

Attachments: The following attachments are mandatory:

ü  Notice of resignation filed with the company.
ü  Proof of dispatch-{Attachment section of form DIR-11, asks for proof of dispatch. Now the question is --- Is there any requirement of formal dispatch through post which generates proof of dispatch? My Answer is “NO”.   We can very well use scan copy of “Receiving” of resignation letter given by responsible official of the company in case of personal delivery. Further scan copy of printout of E-mail through which resignation tendered would be enough as proof of dispatch}.
ü  Acknowledgement received from company, if any and is mandatory if yes selected in option at serial no 6. {Point no. 6 in form DIR-11 inquires whether confirmation is received from the company w.r.t. the resignation of Director. As per my understanding if we mention “NO” in the E-form, there will be no issue in future as confirmation of resignation from company is not mandatory u/s 168.  
ü  When a director files eForm DIR-11 for intimating about his resignation before the company files eForm DIR-12, an email will be sent to the company for filing the eForm DIR-12 and the status of the Director in the company will be changed to ‘Resigned’ against the selected designation. Once the company files the relevant eForm DIR-12, the status shall be changed as per the existing system.
We can use Board Resolution for taking note of resignation or Resignation acceptance Letter by the Company as Evidence of Cessation. Further Resignation Letter given by the Director shall act as Notice of Resignation filed with the Company. I sincerely believe that above article would be of some help for understanding.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

(Author – CS Divesh Goyal, GOYAL DIVESH & ASSOCIATES is a Company Secretary in Practice from Delhi and can be contacted at csdiveshgoyal@gmail.com) Disclaimer: The entire contents of this document have been prepared on the basis of relevant provisions and as per the information existing at the time of the preparation. Though utmost efforts has made to provide authentic information, it is suggested that to have better understanding kindly cross-check the relevant sections, rules under the Companies Act, 2013. The observations of the author are personal view and the authors do not take responsibility of the same and this cannot be quoted before any authority without the written







The Companies Act, 2013 - 5 key issues

The new Companies Act, 2013 has triggered new debate. What are the key changes? What is an impact on corporate word? Lot of seminars, conferences and clinics are being organized by various institutions and organizations to understand the nittygritty of the new law. Despite the fact that rules are
yet to be notified and they are too many, quite a bit of apprehension prevailing right now in the air. In this write up, I will focus on limited area to capture 5 key issues, which will have an impact on accounting and auditing of companies with this new development.

Financial Year
The financial year is proposed to be synchronized and all the companies will have their yearly closing on 31st March. Sounds nice! Let us have a closer look. What will happen to auditors? All the audit reports to be issued simultaneously. Auditor community will have to work hard on closing dates and it will not be possible to spread the work. Any concern for Independent
directors, who will have to attend the board meetings - all happening at the same time ?. Issue remains open. The subsidiary companies of foreign companies will have another addition to their compliance requirement and they will need another permission in order to close the books according to head office guidelines.

Accounting Standards
Second issue is about Accounting Standards. Already there is lot of confusion as to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), Indian Accounting
Standards (Ind-AS), which are converged with IFRS and notified Accounting Standards (AS) are all on my desk. IFRS applicable for the companies who need to report outside India - so they are converting their financials accordingly. Ind-AS already notified and awaiting date of implementation. It is heard informally that they might become applicable to section of companies with effect from April 1, 2015. All companies are supposed to prepare financial statements according to AS - which may result in conflicts with this new Act. At various places, IFRS has been kept in mind, as this is the future. What about present? The Act itself is defining what will
be called financial statements. Besides Balance sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and accounting policies, Statement of Change in Equity (SOCIE) and Cash flow statements (CFS) are now necessary. This is in contradiction of existing Schedule VI and Accounting Standard on Cash Flow (AS-3) which is mandating CFS only for certain companies and not everyone.

Auditors
As per the new Act, auditors are to be appointed for a term of five years and the same auditor can be there for two terms. That means it will be compulsory to change auditor after every 10 years. All of us know Indian scenario. Maximum of family owned businesses are having old association with their
auditor and the same auditor is carrying out audit for many years. Advantage - they are aware of the business environment and quickly complete the audits. Disadvantage can be seen as probability of overlooking is higher and relationship can influence the audit results. Another issue is deciding the fate of old auditors - whether this 5 year and 10 year term starts now or will be retrospective. Yet to see.

Consolidation
Fourth, consolidation made mandatory and is surely a welcome move. But what about definition of control. As per IFRS-10, the companies, which have power to govern financial and operation policies of an entity and are exposed to risk and ownership rights thereof are supposed to be controlling the entity and are supposed to consolidate. AS 10 is more rule based and defines control in terms of having more than 50 per cent of voting rights or control over more than half of board. This will need clear guidance and will certainly ignite some
serious debate in the market. Of course, we all want true and fair presentation of the financial statements, but practical realities and subjectivity remain there. Reopening of Financials Once the financial statements have been adopted by the shareholders, the previous Act did not allow any tinkering with those financial statements. That means there was no possibility of restatement or re-opening of such financial statements. This Act will allow reopening of previous financial statements. The concept is similar to IFRS, and probably outcome of recent exposed cases in Indian corporate world. It carries its own challenges in terms of role and responsibilities of previous directors and auditors. Details have to be seen how it will be used or misused in Indian Scenario. This is my fifth case. Lots of questions are floating in the air. Dependency on rules, draft is exposed to public for comments (when this piece is written). Personally feel that full marks to be given to our young minister for being able to push it through, as there had been lot of disappointments and wasted efforts in the past. We all know about human tendency to resist change - but change is rule and this change is certainly one of the most welcome changes in the corporate world.
(ICAI Student Journal, CA Praveen Kumar)
-->