Failed candidates could endanger lives of PSC interviewer; their personal details out of ambit of RTI Act

Disclosure of names and addresses of members of Interview Board of PSC would ex facie endanger their lives; such disclosure would serve no fruitful public purpose

In the instant case the Bihar Public Service Commission (‘the Commission’) published advertisement to fill up post of 'State Examiner of Questioned Documents in police Laboratory’. The advertisement stated that written examination would be conducted if adequate number of applications were received. Since limited applications were received, selection was done on basis of viva voce test. The respondent filed an application before the Commission seeking information regarding interview conducted for aforesaid post. The Commission furnished all information. However, particulars of members of interview Board were not furnished. Aggrieved assessee filed the writ in HC which was also dismissed. Assessee challenged the judgment of the learned Single Judge before the Division Bench of that Court which held in favour of assessee.

On appeal, the Supreme Court held as under:

1) The disclosure of names and addresses of the members of the Interview Board would ex facie endanger their lives or physical safety. The possibility of a failed candidate attempting to take revenge from such persons couldn’t be ruled out. Disclosure was likely to expose the members of the interview Board to harm and it would serve no public purpose;

2) Furthermore, the view of the High Court in the judgment under appeal that element of bias could be traced and would be crystallized only if the names and addresses of the interviewers were furnished, was without any substance;

3) The element of bias could hardly be correlated with the disclosure of the names and addresses of the interviewers. The transparency that was expected to be maintained in such process would not take within its ambit the disclosure of the information called for regarding the names and particulars of examiners;

4) Transparency in such cases was relatable to the process where selection was based on collective wisdom and collective marking. Marks were required to be disclosed but disclosure of individual names would hardly be relevant either to the concept of transparency or for proper exercise of the right to information. The judgment of HC was to be set aside and the Commission was not bound to disclose the information asked for by the applicant - BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION V. SAIYED HUSSAIN ABBAS RIZWI (2013) 35 taxmann.com 333 (SC)

Get Sudycafe's Updates by SMS in your mobile by Following below two Steps: 

1.Download our Android Software & 

2. Send a SMS, Type: JOIN CASTUDYCAFE & send to 9219592195

Subscribe to Studycafe by Email

Read more »

Procedure to obtain answer sheets of CA Exams

For seeking information You should make an application in writing or through electronic means to the PIO / APIO of the PA concerned (i.e refer your application to PIO-Public Information Officer, ICAI,) ..in English / Hindi.

The application can be sent by post or through electronic means or the information seeker can deliver it personally in the office of the PIO - i.e you can submit your application to

ICAI, HEAD OFFICE             OR

BOARD OF STUDIES,  ICAI, NOIDA.

The application should specify particulars of the information sought accompanying fee- Rs. 10/-[Section. 6(1)] If a person is unable to make a request in writing, the PIO shall render all reasonable assistance to the person making the request orally to reduce the same in writing. Where a decision is taken to give access to a sensorial disabled person to any document, the PIO shall provide such assistance to the person as maybe appropriate for the inspection of records.

An applicant shall not be required to give any reason for requesting the information or any other personal details except those that may be necessary for Contacting [Section.6(2)]

The applicant, along with the application, should send application fee to the Public Information Officer. In case of Government of India prescribed application  fee is Rs. 10/- which can be paid through a demand draft or a banker’s cheque or an Indian Postal Order payable to the Accounts Officer of the public authority. The payment of fee can also be made by way of cash to the Accounts Officer of  the public authority or to the Assistant Public Information Officer against proper  receipt.Accounts Officer of Public Authority PIO must have to reply within 30 days of submitting your application.

Format of application you can use:

To,

Public Information Officer,

Indraprastha Marg,

ICAI,

New Delhi,

Subject: Required information under section 2(j) of RTI Act,2005.

Sir,

Using my right under section 2(j) of RTI Act,2005 I required the following information:

bodyline>>>>>>>>>>>>what information you required >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Information required is validly covered under section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005.

Please provide information as early as possible.

Requisite fees of Rs. 10/- deposited, proof enclosed/DD Enclosed etc.

Yours,

signature

NAME

ADDRESS

PHONE


DOWNLOAD RTI ACT 2005

Read more »