[X] Close
[X] Close

BUDGET 2014: DIRECT TAX PROPOSALS

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

   1)      Fiscal Deficit targeted at 4.1% for 2014-15 and to bring it to 3% by 2016-17.  
   2)      GST to be introduced by the year end.
   3)      No retrospective amendments by this Government.
   4)      A new committee under CBDT to study cases pending because of retrospective amendments.
   5)      FDI on Defense and Insurance raised to 49%.
   6)      To allow FDI upto 49% in select sectors.
   7)      E Visa to be allowed on 9 major Airports.
   8)      PSU Banks to need a Capital Infusion of Rs 2.48 Lakhs Crore by 2018.
   9)      Change in Dividend Distribution Tax Calculation applicable from 1st Oct 2014.
   10)  Various Plans And Budget Allocations

S No
Allocation For
Budget Allocation
1
100 New Cities
7060 Crore
2
Rural Road Developments (PMGSY)
14389 Crore
3
Rural Enterprenuership Programme
100 Crore
4
Rural Drinking Water Programme
3600 Crore
5
Improving Irrigation
1000 Crore
6
Rural Housing Scheme
8000 Crore
7
Metro Projects For Ahmedabad & Lucknow
100 Crore
8
Affordable Housing VIA NHB
4000 Crore
9
National Housing Board
12000 Crore
10
Muncipal Debt Management
50000 Crore
11
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan
28635 Crore
12
Setting of IIT and IIM
500 Crore
13
Low Cost Housing for Young Citizens
4000 Crore
14
Agri Infra Funds
100 Crore
15
National Industrial Corridor
100 Crore
16
Young entrepreneurs
10000 Crore
17
Farm Warehousing plan
500 Crore
18
Long Term Rural Credit fund
50000 Crore
19
6 Textile Clusters
200 Crore
20
Agri University In Haryana
200 Crore
21
Harbour Projects
11635 Crore
22
National Industrial Corridor in Pune
100 Crore
22
Farm Price Stabilization
500 Crore
23
Investment In NHAI & State Roads
37850 Crore
24
Preparatory Work On Clean Thermal Energy
100 Crore
25
Defence Sector
229000 Crore
26
State Police Modernization
300 Crore
27
Socio Economic Development Of Villages
990 Crore
28
5 Tourist Circuits
500 Crore
29
Boosting Rail Connectivity In Border Area
1000 Crore


DIRECT TAX PROVISIONS

1)      New Slab Rates

FOR INDIVIDUALS & HUF & BODY OF INDIVIDUALS
Upto Rs.2,50,000                                             Nil.
Rs. 2,50,001 to Rs. 5,00,000                           10 per cent.
Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs. 10,00,000                         20 per cent.
Above Rs. 10,00,000                                       30 per cent.

FOR SENIOR CITIZEN
Upto Rs.3,00,000                                             Nil.
Rs. 3,00,001 to Rs. 5,00,000                           10 per cent.
Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs.10,00,000                          20 per cent.
Above Rs. 10,00,000                                       30 per cent.

FOR SENIOR CITIZEN AGED ABOVE 80 Years
Upto Rs. 5,00,000                                            Nil.
Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs. 10,00,000                         20 per cent.
Above Rs. 10,00,000                                       30 per cent.

If Total Income crosses One Crore then the above rates would be enhanced by 10% Surcharge.

2)      80C Limit Enhanced to Rs 150000 from Rs 100000.
3)      Deduction from House property Enhanced from Rs 150000 to Rs 200000.

4)      Amendment in Section 32AC of Income Tax Act, Limit reduced from 100 Crore to Rs 25 Crore.
Section 32AC states that 15% Investment Allowance would be allowed in case company Invest Rs 25 Crore or more in Plant and Machinery.
15% is over and above the Depreciation.

5)      10 year tax holiday extended to the undertakings which begin generation, distribution and transmission of power by 31.03.2017.
6)      2 New Business Added for Deduction Under Section 35AD
a.      Slurry Pipeline for transportation of Iron Ore.
b.      Setting Up and Operating a Semi conductor wafer fabrication Manufacturing Unit.
7)      Use period of 8 years now specified under section 35AD.

8)      Period of holding for short term capital gain has been increased to 36 Months for shares.

9)      Foreign Dividend received by Indian companies now will get low tax benefit of 15% without limiting it to particular Assessment Year.

10)  Section 92CC of the Act relates to Advance Pricing Agreement (APA). However, these agreement were valid for future transactions and transaction entered earlier usually enter into Litigations. In order to streamline this, APA may be sought for 4 previous years.

11)  Security held by FII which has invested such In such security in accordance with regulations made under SEBI Act,1962 would be treated at Capital Asset and any income arising from that would be capital Gain.

12)  Entities other than companies claiming deduction under Section 35AD, now under the preview of Alternate Minimum Tax taxable @ 18.5%. However benefit of depreciation would be allowed.

Example:
Total income :                                                                                     Rs. 60
Deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A :                                           Rs. 40
Deduction claimed under section 35AD on a capital asset :              Rs. 100

Computation of adjusted total income for the purposes of AMT



Total income :                                                                                     Rs. 60
Addition:
(i) deduction under Chapter VI-A (on non-specified business) :         Rs. 40
(ii) deduction under section 35AD (on specified business)    Rs. 100
Less: depreciation under section 32                                       Rs. 15  Rs. 85
Adjusted total income under section 115JC :                                     Rs. 185


13)  Any advance forfeited against any capital asset would now be taxable under income from other Sources. Also, advance forfeited earlier was reduced from cost of asset and now it won’t be reduced to remove double taxation.

14)  Any sum received from Life Insurance companies which is not exempt under section 10(10D) of the Act, including sum received as bonus would now be subject to TDS @2% . However if amount received is less than 1 Lac no TDS is to be deducted.

15)  Transfer pricing officer now powered to levy penalty Under Section 271G of the Act. Earlier only AO has the power to levy penalty.
16)  Expenditure incurred under CSR would not be allowed as deduction under section 37 of Income tax Act.
17)  In case of Non deduction of TDS or nonpayment of tax, the disallowance would be restricted to 30% of the amount of expenditure.
18)  Applicability of section 40(a)(ia) {i.e. disallowance of expenditure in case TDS is not deducted or not paid} on payments made under chapter XVII-B {I.e Salary, director remuneration etc.}
19)  Presumptive tax in case of plying, hiring or Leasing of goods carriages in case assessee does not hold 10 good carriages at any time during the year.
Presumptive tax increased to Rs 7500 per vehicle per month.

20)  Any transfer of government security carrying a periodic payment of interest from one non resident to another non resident would not be considered as transfer under section 47 of Income Tax Act.
21)  Amendment under section 54 : Deduction is only available if new resident house is located in India
22)  Amendment under section 54F : Deduction is available for only 1 residential house located in India.
23)  The eligible date of borrowing in foreign currency extended from 30.06.2015 to 30.06.2017 for a concessional tax rate of 5 percent on interest payments. Tax incentive extended to all types of bonds instead of only infrastructure bonds.
24)  Mutual fund company, venture capital company and venture capital fund and securitization fund are now required to furnish a return of income under section 139(4C) of income tax act.
25)  Deduction under Section 80CCD now allowed to Private sector employees too.

Section 80CCD relates to contribution to pension funds subject to a maximum of 10% of salary.


This Article has been shared by CA Gaurav Mittal. He can be reached at mittalgaurav05@gmail.com

Budget 2014: CHARITABLE INSTITUTION – MAMMOTH CHANGES

CHARITABLE INSTITUTION – MAMMOTH CHANGES
The existing provisions of section 11 of the Act provide for exemption to trusts or institutions in respect of income derived from property held under trust and voluntary contributions subject to various conditions contained in the said section. The primary condition for grant of exemption is that the income derived from property held under trust should be applied for the charitable purposes, and where such income cannot be applied during the previous year, it has to be accumulated in the modes prescribed and applied for such purposes in accordance with various conditions provided in the section. If the accumulated income is not applied in accordance with the conditions provided in the said section, then such income is deemed to be taxable income of the trust or institution.

Section 13 of the Act provides for the circumstances under which exemption under section 11 or 12 in respect of whole or part of income would not be available to a trust or institution.

The sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA and 13 constitute a complete code governing the grant or withdrawal of registration and its cancellation, providing exemption to income, and also the conditions under which a charitable trust or institution needs to function in order to be eligible for exemption. They also provide for withdrawal of exemption either in part or in full if the relevant conditions are not fulfilled.

Several issues have arisen in respect of the application of exemption regime in cases of trusts or institutions in respect of which clarity in law is required.
The first issue is regarding the interplay of the general provision of exemptions which are contained in section 10 of the Act vis.-a-vis. the specific and special exemption regime covered in sections 11 to 13. As indicated above, the primary objective of providing exemption in case of charitable institution is that income derived from the property held under trust should be applied and utilized for the object or purpose for which the institution or trust has been established. In many cases it has been noted that trusts or institutions which are registered and have been claiming benefits of the exemption regime do not apply their income, which is derived from property held under trust, for charitable purposes. In such circumstances, when the income becomes taxable, then a claim of exemption under general provisions of section 10 in respect of such income is preferred and tax on such income is avoided. This defeats the very objective and purpose of placing the conditions of application of income etc. in respect of income derived from property under trust in the first place.

Sections 11, 12 and 13 are special provisions governing institutions which are being given benefit of tax exemption, it is therefore imperative that once a person voluntarily opts for the special dispensation it should be governed by these specific provisions and should not be allowed flexibility of being governed by other general provisions or specific provisions at will. Allowing such flexibility has undesirable effects on the objects of the regulations and leads to litigations.

Similar situation exists in the context of section 10(23C) which provides for exemption to funds, institution, hospitals, etc. which have been granted approval by the prescribed authority. The provision of section 10(23C) also have similar conditions of accumulation and application of income, investment of funds in prescribed modes etc.

Therefore, it is proposed to amend the Act to provide specifically that where a trust or an institution has been granted registration for purposes of availing exemption under section 11, and the registration is in force for a previous year, then such trust or institution cannot claim any exemption under any provision of section 10 [other than that relating to exemption of agricultural income and income exempt under section 10(23C)]. Similarly, entities which have been approved or notified for claiming benefit of exemption under section 10(23C) would not be entitled to claim any benefit of exemption under other provisions of section 10 (except the exemption in respect of agricultural income).

The second issue which has arisen is that the existing scheme of section 11 as well as section 10(23C) provides exemption in respect of income when it is applied to acquire a capital asset. Subsequently, while computing the income for purposes of these sections, notional deduction by way of depreciation etc. is claimed and such amount of notional deduction remains to be applied for charitable purpose. Therefore, double benefit is claimed by the trusts and institutions under the existing law. The provisions need to be rationalised to ensure that double benefit is not claimed and such notional amount does not get excluded from the condition of application of income for charitable purpose.

In view of the above, it is also proposed to amend the Act to provide that under section 11 and section 10(23C), income for the purposes of application shall be determined without any deduction or allowance by way of depreciation or otherwise in respect of any asset, acquisition of which has been claimed as an application of income under these sections in the same or any other previous year.

These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2015 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent assessment years.


Clarification in respect of section 10(23C) of the Act
The existing provisions of sub-clause (iiiab) and (iiiac) of section 10(23C) of the Act provide exemption, subject to various conditions, in respect of income of certain educational institutions, universities and hospitals which exist solely for educational purposes or solely for philanthropic purposes, and not for purposes of profit and which are wholly or substantially financed by the Government.

Absence of a definition of the phrase “substantially financed by the Government” has led to litigation and varying decisions of judicial authorities who have, for this purpose, relied upon various other provisions of the Income-tax Act and other Acts. Thus, there is lack of certainty in this regard.
Therefore, it is proposed to amend section 10(23C) by inserting an Explanation that if the Government grant to a university or other educational institution, hospital or other institution during the relevant previous year exceeds a percentage (to be prescribed) of the total receipts (including any voluntary contributions), of such university or other educational institution, hospital or other institution, as the case may be, then such university or other educational institution, hospital or other institution shall be considered as being substantially financed by the Government for that previous year.
This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2015 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent assessment years.

Cancellation of registration of the trust or institution in certain cases
The existing provisions of section 12AA of the Act provide that the registration once granted to a trust or institution shall remain in force till it is cancelled by the Commissioner. The Commissioner can cancel the registration under two circumstances:
(a) The activities of a trust or institution are not genuine, or;
(b) The activities are not being carried out in accordance with the objects of the trust or institution.
Only if either or both the above conditions are met, would the Commissioner be empowered to cancel the registration, and not otherwise. Therefore, the powers of Commissioner to cancel registration are severely restricted. There have been cases where trusts, particularly in the year in which they have substantial income claimed to be exempt under other provisions of the Act, deliberately violate provisions of section 13 by investing in prohibited mode etc. Similarly, there have been cases where the income is not properly applied for charitable purposes or has been diverted for benefit of certain interested persons. Due to restrictive interpretation of the powers of the Commissioner under section 12AA, registration of such trusts or institutions continues to be in force and these institutions continue to enjoy the beneficial regime of exemption.

Whereas under section 10(23C), which also allows similar benefits of exemption to a fund, Institution, University etc, the power of withdrawal of approval is vested with the prescribed authority if such authority is satisfied that such entity has not applied income or made investment in accordance with provisions of section 10(23C) or the activities of such entity are not genuine or are not being carried out in accordance with all or any of the conditions subject to which it was approved.

Therefore, in order to rationalize the provisions relating to cancellation of registration of a trust, it is proposed to amend section 12AA of the Act to provide that where a trust or an institution has been granted registration, and subsequently it is noticed that its activities are being carried out in such a manner that,—
(i) Its income does not ensure for the benefit of general public;
(ii) It is for benefit of any particular religious community or caste (in case it is established after commencement of the Act);
(iii) Any income or property of the trust is applied for benefit of specified persons like author of trust, trustees etc.; or
(iv) Its funds are invested in prohibited modes,
Then the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner may cancel the registration if such trust or institution does not prove that there was a reasonable cause for the activities to be carried out in the above manner.
This amendment will take effect from 1st October, 2014.

Anonymous donations under section 115BBC
The existing provisions of section 115BBC of the Act provide for levy of tax at the rate of 30 % in case of certain assessees, being university, hospital, charitable organization, etc. on the amount of aggregate anonymous donations exceeding five per cent of the total donations received by the assessee or one lakh rupees, whichever is higher.

Due to the mechanism of aggregation of tax provided in section 115BBC, while tax at the rate of 30 percent is levied on the amount of anonymous donations exceeding the threshold, the remaining tax is chargeable on total income after reducing the full amount of anonymous donations. The proper way of computation is to reduce the income by the amount which has been taxed at the rate of 30 per cent.

Therefore, it is proposed to amend section 115BBC to provide that the income-tax payable shall be the aggregate of the amount of income-tax calculated at the rate of thirty per cent on the aggregate of anonymous donations received in excess of five per cent of the total donations received by the assessee or one lakh rupees, whichever is higher, and the amount of income-tax with which the assessee would have been chargeable had his total income been reduced by the aggregate of the anonymous donations which is in excess of the five per cent of the total donations received by the assessee or one lakh rupees, as the case may be.

This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2015 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2015-16 and subsequent assessment years.

Applicability to earlier years of the registration granted to a trust or institution
The existing provisions of section 12 A of the Act provide that a trust or an institution can claim exemption under sections 11 and 12 only after registration under section 12AA has been granted. In case of trusts or institutions which apply for registration after 1st June, 2007, the registration shall be effective only prospectively.

Non-application of registration for the period prior to the year of registration causes genuine hardship to charitable organizations. Due to absence of registration, tax liability gets attached even though they may otherwise be eligible for exemption and fulfil other substantive conditions. The power of condonation of delay in seeking registration is not available under the section.
In order to provide relief to such trusts and remove hardship in genuine cases, it is proposed to amend section 12 A of the Act to provide that in case where a trust or institution has been granted registration under section 12AA of the Act, the benefit of sections 11 and 12 shall be available in respect of any income derived from property held under trust in any assessment proceeding for an earlier assessment year which is pending before the Assessing Officer as on the date of such registration, -if the objects and activities of such trust or institution in the relevant earlier assessment year are the same as those on the basis of which such registration has been granted.

Further, it is proposed that no action for reopening of an assessment under section 147 shall be taken by the Assessing Officer in the case of such trust or institution for any assessment year preceding the first assessment year for which the registration applies, merely for the reason that such trust or institution has not obtained the registration under section 12AA for the said assessment year.

However, the above benefits would not be available in case of any trust or institution which at any time had applied for registration and the same was refused under section 12AA or a registration once granted was cancelled.

These amendments will take effect from 1st October, 2014.

This Article has been shared by CA Gaurav Mittal. He can be reached at mittalgaurav05@gmail.com
-->