‘AND’ &
‘OR’ a Mess in Companies Act, 2013
‘AND’ &
‘OR’ statements behave very differently. ‘AND’ signifies
that both conditions are required to be satisfied while ‘OR’ signifies that
only one condition must be met.
I.
In section 2, clause (85) of Companies Act, 2013 ,
Small company is defined as:
‘‘small company’’ means a
company, other than a public company,
(i)
paid-up share capital of which does not exceed fifty
lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall not be more
than five crore rupees;
OR
(ii)
turnover of which as per its last
profit and loss account does not exceed two crore rupees
or
such higher amount as may be prescribed which shall not be more than twenty
crore rupees:
The
Interpretation of the above definition is that, if any one of the conditions is satisfied, the company shall be
classified in the category of Small Company and can avail many
benefits/exemptions provided in the Companies Act, 2013 for Small companies.
For example: Company “X Pvt Ltd” having paid up capital of 40
lakhs and Turnover of 200 crore, then also Company “X Pvt Ltd” shall be treated
as Small company as it fulfills One criteria of Paid up capital of less than 50
lakh i.e, 40 Lakhs as per the definition given in section 2, clause (85)
of Companies Act, 2013.
This
must not be the Intention of the Law maker that company having Turnover of 200
crore is placed in the category of Small Company.
Definition
Modified: Realising
the Error, Ministry of Corporate Affairs in Companies (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2015 published on 13th February, 2015
clarified that in section 2, clause (85), word
“OR” occurring at the end, the word “AND” shall be substituted.
II.
In Chapter II
of “The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014”,
Rule 7 , sub-rule (1), provides
the condition for
Conversion of private company into One Person Company, which is reproduced
as under:
1)
A private company other than a company
registered under section 8 of the Act having paid up share capital of fifty
lakhs rupees or less OR average
annual turnover during the relevant period is two crore rupees or less may convert itself into one person company
by passing a special resolution in the general meeting.
The Interpretation of
the above definition is that, if any one
of the conditions is satisfied, then
private company other than a company registered
under section 8 of the Act less may
convert itself into one Person Company by passing a special resolution in the
general meeting
For Example: Company “X Pvt Ltd” having paid up capital of 40 lakhs
and Turnover of 200 crore, then also Company “X
Pvt Ltd” may convert itself
into one Person Company by passing a special resolution in the general meeting,
as it fulfills One criteria of
Paid up capital of less than 50 lakh i.e, 40 Lakhs, as per Rule 7 , sub-rule
(1), The Companies (Incorporation)
Rules, 2014.
Again, this must not be the
Intention of the Law maker giving the option to private company having Turnover
of 200 crore to convert itself into one Person
Company because :
As per rule 6 of
The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, OPC needs to convert itself into a
public company or a private company in certain cases.-
Where the paid up share capital of an
One Person Company exceeds fifty lakh rupees or its average annual turnover
during the relevant period* exceeds two crore rupees, it shall cease to be
entitled to continue as a OPC.
We can extract condition which needs to
be fulfilled for a Company to get the privilege of One Person Company. i.e,
a) The
paid up share capital of an OPC does not exceeds fifty lakh rupees or its
average annual turnover during the relevant period*
does not exceeds two crore rupees.
*"relevant
period" means the period of immediately preceding three consecutive
financial years.
Rules
Modified: Realising
the Error, Ministry of Corporate Affairs , on 01st May , 2015
notified The Companies (Incorporation)
Amendment Rules, 2015,
which is reproduced below :
In
rule 7, in sub-rule (1), for the words “ having paid up share capital of fifty
lakhs rupees or less OR average
annual turnover” during the relevant period is , the words “ having paid up
share capital of fifty lakhs rupees or less AND average annual turnover during the relevant period shall be
substituted;
III.
In Chapter II
of “The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014”, Rule 6 , sub-rule
(1),
Provides that One Person Company to
convert itself into a public company or a private
company in
certain cases , which is reproduced as under:
1) Where
the paid up share capital of an One Person Company exceeds fifty lakh rupees OR its average annual turnover during
the relevant period exceeds two crore rupees, it shall cease to be entitled to
continue as a One Person Company.
Ministry
of Corporate Affairs, on 01st May, 2015 notified The
Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2015,
which is reproduced below:
“In
rule 6, for sub-rule (11), for the words “having paid up share capital of fifty
lakhs rupees or less or average annual turnover”, the words “having paid up
share capital of fifty lakhs rupees or less AND average annual turnover shall be substituted.
Observations: I
could not find any sub-rule (11), in rule 6 of “The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.”
If the amendment is assumed as sub-rule
(1) instead of sub-rule (11), Then the rule will be read as One Person Company to convert
itself into a public company or a private company in certain cases:
Where
the paid up share capital of an One Person Company exceeds fifty lakh rupees AND its average annual turnover during
the relevant period exceeds two crore rupees, it shall cease to be entitled to
continue as a One Person Company.
The Interpretation of the above definition is that, if Both of the conditions are fulfilled
the One Person Company shall cease
to be entitled to continue as a One Person Company.
For example: Company “X Pvt Ltd” having paid up capital of 40 lakhs and
Turnover of 200 crores, then also Company “X Pvt Ltd” may not convert itself into a public company or a private company as it doesn’t
fulfills both criteria of Paid up capital of fifty lakh rupees AND its average annual turnover during
the relevant period.
Though the Rule 6, sub-rule (1) free
from error, Ministry of Corporate Affairs had inadvertently changed the rule
and made another delusion.
Conclusion: Ministry of Corporate Affairs while correcting two
error/omission, discussed in point no I
and II above, had made another error discussed in point no III. We can expect
another amendment in near future for correction of rule
6, for sub-rule (1)
of The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.
Disclaimer: Statements and opinions expressed in
articles are those of the author’s personal views. While every care has been
taken in the compilation of this information and every attempt made to present
up-to-date and accurate information, we cannot guarantee that inaccuracies will
not occur. Readers are advised to refer relevant provision of law before
applying or accepting any of the point mentioned above. Author accepts no
responsibility whatsoever and will not be liable for any losses, claims or
damages which may arise because of the contents of this write up
The Author is an Associate Member of the
Institute of Company Secretaries of India.
KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA
Practicing Company Secretary
New Delhi
Mob : +91-9899208090
Purchase from flipkart or Amazon via Studycafe special link and get Discounts on every product
Purchase from flipkart or Amazon via Studycafe special link and get Discounts on every product
Follow @studycafe1
0 comments:
Post a Comment