Following problem has been
referred to us by several users of this Site:
|
A manufacturing company
sells particular goods for a certain price (say Rs.10, 00,000=00) to its
selling dealers. Company realizes Rs. 1, 25,000/- towards VAT @12.5 % and
deposits such VAT amount into the Government Treasury through Bank. The
purchasing dealer pays to the company total sum of Rs. 11, 25,000/-. Company
promises to the purchasing dealer for allowing him a credit of Rs. 4, 00,000
after a certain period. Also company instructs the purchasing dealer for
making subsequent sale of such goods for Rs. 6, 60,000/-. The purchasing
dealer sells such goods for Rs. 6,60,000 and realizes Rs. 82500/- as VAT @
12.5 % on sale price of Rs. 6,60,000/-. Dealer claims input tax credit of Rs.
125,000/. As the amount of output VAT is less than the amount of VAT paid in
respect of purchase of goods, the dealer claims refund of differential amount
which works out Rs.42,500/-.
|
Querists want to know whether
process is adopted by dealer purchasing goods from the company is valid in
view of provisions of the VAT Act.
|
Reason why companies are
adopting such practice is not clear. It has been stated that companies do not
claim any refund out of the amount of VAT deposited by them. Also they do not
issue any credit note for any amount of VAT.
|
Assuming that the sale price
is not suppressed by the purchasing dealer and sale price declared by such
dealer is actual sale price, then his output tax is the amount of VAT
computed on his sale price. As per VAT law, selling dealer, subject to
provisions of Input Tax Credit, is liable for payment of tax on sale price.
At the same time, if amount of input tax credit exceeds the amount of tax
payable, then such dealer is entitled for claiming refund of the amount which
exceeds the amount of output tax.
|
VAT is indirect consumption
based tax. In the system, the Government gets the amount of tax which is paid
by the ultimate consumer. Credit of input tax cannot be denied where after
purchasing particular goods the same are sold at a price lower than the
purchase price.
|
But in the case before us,
we have also to look into the situation at the stage of company. If Amount
(Rs. 10,00,000/-) realized by the company is not the sale price for the
purpose of VAT, then tax payable on turnover of goods sold by the company
will differ from the amount realized and deposited by him. Amount which is
not leviable as per provisions of law cannot be assessed even if selling
dealer deposits it voluntarily. Then excess amount deposited will have to be
treated in the manner provided under the VAT law. For such cases, most of the
laws provide for refund of such amount to the person from whom it has been
realized and if such dealer has not passed burden of this amount to others.
Since the purchasing dealer has already claimed refund of total amount
collected by the company by way of input tax credit, he will not be entitled
for any other refund. But the Department will have to receive excess amount
paid by the company in the revenue account. But unfair practice cannot be
allowed to be continued.
|
If amount charged as sale
price by the company from the selling dealer is sale price for the purpose of
levy of VAT on the company, then question of excess realization will not
arise and tax realized and deposited by the company will be tax leviable and
payable. In that case, without going into other details, it can be said that
process adopted by both dealers is legally valid.
This Article is written by CMA Samir Biswal. He
can be reached at cmasamirbiswal@gmail.com.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment