It’s pretty much definite that we all have heard of Vodafone case and constitute same a landmark in Indian Judicial System.
Possibly Shell India case will be
one such case too shaking the roots of FDI
by probing in to the system.
This Article has been posted by Raja Vardhan. He Can be reached at a.rajvardhan@gmail.com
The recent news is that Shell India had received a notice
from Income Tax Department on tax evasion in the month of January and Shri. Prasenjit Bhattacharya
representing Shell India said that they would challenge the notice.
To understand the case better let me just take you through
the granny’s story of Shell India:
Decades ago an Royal
Dutch Shell being an Anglo-Dutch multinational oil and gas company wanted
to enter into the south Asian Countries. In India it incorporated a co. by the
name Shell India Markets Pvt Ltd. as an Indian Co. and was controlling Shell India (the Child) by Shell Gas BV (the parent) a foreign
company. Shell Gas BV was holding 100% stake in Shell India. To intensify its
business proceedings in India Shell India came out with issue of equity shares
in the year 2009. And the stage was well set for the IT Dept. to make its entry
when all of such shares were bought by Shell Gas BV(Foreign Co.) i.e. nothing
but Foreign (In)Direct Investment of Rs. 87 Crores , the area of conflict
being that all such shares were issued at Rs.
10/Share (18 US Cents) . And here comes the twist in the story, the
entry was late but it was the ultimate and latest thing that happened when IT
Dept. sent a notice in Jan 2013 to Shell Gas BV depicting that the Shell India
was undervalued in connection with the Equity issue in the March 2009 the shares issue to Shell Gas BV were
issued at Rs.10/share, but the
income-tax authorities peg the deal at Rs.183/share.
Shri. Prasenjit Bhattacharya after
consultation with Shri. Vikram Mehta
(CEO Shell India) said on Monday 4th of February that it would
challenge a tax department notice which claims that it underpriced a sale of
shares to an overseas group company by $
2.7 Billion and claimed that “Recent
media reports on tax evasion are baseless, and Shell India will challenge this
order strongly and is evaluating all options for redress” and they dint
reveal the amount of tax demand raised in connection to tax evasion. The future is left with the decision of the
one in the scorner’s seat. This case could go any way round, being a happy
ending to either of the parties.
After reading the granny’s story of Shell you are expected
to be left with following questions:
v Will Shell India have an Happy ending in this case ?
Possibly Yes! As the
Shell said the adjustment was on account of an issue of equity shares by Shell
India to its sole parent, Shell Gas BV, in March 2009 to finance investments
and to fund business activities. Shell Gas BV was the only parent of Shell
India before this equity issue and continued to be so after the issue, it said.
Rs
15,220 Crores ($2.7-billion) adjustment has been proposed in the transfer
pricing order of FY-09 of Shell India
Markets Pvt Ltd (Shell India), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Royal Dutch
Shell Group of Companies.
Adding on to the same Tax
experts said the valuation of the unlisted company was a grey area and would
lead to litigation, just like the Vodafone case. “In a listed company, the valuation is based on SEBI (Securities and
Exchange Board of India) formula, which is the average of six-month or two-week
share price, whichever is higher,” said R S Loona, managing partner of Alliance Corp Lawyers. “But in
unlisted companies, the valuation can be based on fair market price, or book
value, or returns on share based on a certification by an independent valuer.”
And to the best of my
knowledge "there are no provisions
under the income tax law for such revaluation."
Yasmine Hilton, chairman of Shell
Group of Companies in India, said in a statement “Taxing the money received by Shell India is
in effect a tax on foreign direct investment, which is contrary not only to law but also to the
spirit of the recent global trip by the (Indian) finance minister to attract
further FDI into India.”
One more common
sense point is being that “One can’t
make money by mere purchase.”
v Can IT Dept. make a global breakthrough against Shell India?
This part is
still poised and kept suspense as Income tax authorities couldn't be reached by
media for comment or IT Dept dint wanted to disclose the same now and wanted to
keep its arguments awaited.
We all have witnessed Income Department making
retrospective amendments in revenue interest in the landmark Vodafone Case. As
the amount of tax demand in this case too is high, I won’t be amazed if there
are any such amendments in near future to bring Shell India under the lights of
Tax demanded.
Irrespective of the outcome the points of
argument and the expected changes in the law will remain to be good things to
learn. Please feel free to post your views, suggestions and recommendations in
the comment box.
0 comments:
Post a Comment